Editorial and testing policy

We write guides around real tasks: a clear aim, steps, a prompt to adapt, a fictional example, a privacy boundary, and a check before acting.

Safety-sensitive claims link to primary sources where available. We distinguish advice from verified facts, avoid invented experiences or product testing, and review wording when a service changes. A prompt is an example to adapt, not a guarantee of any tool’s output.

At launch, these are editorial examples rather than results of a formal usability study. We will identify any hands-on testing and its scope when we conduct it. Corrections are handled under our corrections policy.